Remanded

Puran Singh Yadav & Ors. v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC8 Jan 2020LPA/186/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposes of an application related to an illegal construction matter by allowing an exemption. The court disposed of the pending appeal along with other applications based on a statement by the respondent undertaking not to construct or change possession status during the writ petition pendency.

What did the court decide?

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Appeals disposed of along with pending applications due to respondent's affidavit undertaking.

Puran Singh Yadav & Ors. Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation Delhi & Ors. — Delhi HC (2020) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~8

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- LPA 186/2018, C.M. Appl.No. 13768/2018, 386-387/2020

¶4

PURAN SINGH YADAV & ORS

¶5

..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ashutosh Dubey, Mr. Ashish Chauhan, Advocate

¶6

versus

¶7

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DELHI & ORS

¶8

..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate for DDA Mr. R.Y. Kalia and Mr. Jagdish Prasad, Advocates for respondent No.3

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 08.01.2020 C.M. Appl. No. 387/2020 (Exemption)

¶12

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶13

LPA 186/2018, C.M. Appl.No. 13768/2018 (Stay), C.M. Appl. No. 386/2020 (Filed by the appellant u/s 340 Cr. P.C.)

¶14

The appellants/petitioners are aggrieved by the interim order dated 21.03.2018, passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. (C) No. 1737/2018.

¶15

By the order dated 21.03.2018, an application filed by the appellants/petitioners for issuing directions to respondent No. 1/Nr.

¶16

LPA 186/2018

¶17

Page 1 of 3

¶18

DMC for demolishing the illegal and unauthorised construction purportedly raised by the respondent No. 3 on land situated in Khasra No.79, Village Shakurpur, Delhi, was disposed of while recording the statement of the counsel for the respondent No.1/Nr. DMC to the effect that no construction was taking place at the site. It is relevant to note that while issuing notice on the present application on 10.04.2018, the predecessor Bench had directed that parties shall maintain status quo with regard to the construction and possession of the property.

¶19

We have been informed that the writ petition is listed before the learned Single Judge on 10.02.2020. Counsel for the respondent No. 3 states on instructions that his client undertakes not to raise any construction on the subject land or change the status of possession thereof during the pendency of the writ petition. He submits that though the SDM of the area had granted permission to the predecessor-in-interest of the respondent No. 3 for constructing a boundary wall on the subject land vide order dated 31.10.2000, his client shall apply afresh to the revenue authority for permission to raise a boundary wall and if such a permission is granted, an appropriate application shall be filed by respondent No. 3 in the writ proceedings to bring the said position to the notice of the learned Single Judge, before taking any steps to raise a boundary wall on the subject land.

¶20

Respondent No. 3 shall file an affidavit on the aforesaid lines LPA 186/2018 Page 2 of 3

¶21

Page 2 of 3

¶22

within two weeks, in the writ petition with a copy to the counsel for the appellant and the remaining respondents.

¶23

The present appeal is disposed of alongwith the pending applications in view of the statement made by the respondent No. 3 above and the order passed separately in Cont. Cas (C) No. 292/2019 today.

¶24

HIMA KOHLI, J

¶25

ASHA MENON, J

¶26

JANUARY 08, 2020 pkb

¶27

LPA 186/2018

¶28

Page 3 of 3

Puran Singh Yadav & Ors. v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Puran Singh Yadav & Ors. v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sakshi Lamba Vs Pradeep Kumar Dahiya

Chubb Alba Control Systems Limited Vs Union of India

Jasbir Kaur Vs Paramjeet Singh

Pratap Dube Vs Rajesh Kumar Gupta & Anr.

Puran Singh Yadav & Ors. Vs R K Aggarwal

Dr Jang Bahadur Singh Vs Jasmohan Singh & Ors.