The high court of delhi dismissed a petition as withdrawn because the petitioner had given an undertaking in RC REV. 560/2017 and did not press the present petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SUBHASH CHAND & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through Mr. Asheesh Jain with Mr. Adarsh Kumar Gupta, Advocates
versus MOHD USMAN ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Sehgal, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 09.01.2020
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the undertaking given by the petitioner in RC REV. 560/2017, he does not press the present petition.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
JANUARY 09, 2020 ‘ rs’
Subhash Chand & Anr
Mohd Usman
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
