The petitioner was told to assert his claim before the Town Vending Committee. The court disposed of the petition based on the petitioner's affidavit filed on 29.03.2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
Through: Ms. Ankita Patnaik, DHCLSC
versus
M.U.SERVER ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER & ANR.
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ajjay Aroraa with Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R % 08.01.2020
Ms. Patnaik, ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the affidavit dated 29.03.2019, the petitioner shall assert his claim before the Town Vending Committee and any further proceedings are not pressed.
In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of.
A. K. CHAWLA, J
JANUARY 08, 2020 acm
RAM KHILARI
M.U.SERVER ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
A. K. Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
