Dismissed
Trilok Chand v. Ishwar Chand
Delhi HCRC.REV./426/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petition as withdrawn after the respondent vacated the premises and parties settled disputes.
What did the court decide?
Leave to withdraw the petition granted.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~12
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RC.REV. 426/2017 & CM APPL.33449/2017 (stay) TRILOK CHAND ..... Petitioner
¶4
- Through Mr. Abhishek Paruthi, Advocate.
¶5
versus
¶6
ISHWAR CHAND ..... Respondent Through Ms. Sonali Malhotra with Mr. Abhinn V. Gupta, Advocates.
¶7
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 09.01.2020
¶8
- Learned counsel for the parties inform that the staircase to the first floor has already been constructed.
¶9
- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already vacated and handed over the peaceful vacant possession of the premises to the respondent on 31.12.2019.
¶10
- Learned counsel for the parties submit that all disputes between the parties have been settled and now no claims are left surviving against each other.
¶11
- Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Trilok Chand
- respondent
Ishwar Chand
Coram
AI extract
Sanjeev Sachdeva
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court