The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition, submitting that respondents acted in compliance with court orders. The withdrawal was accepted.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
versus
TARUN KAPOOR & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Garima Prashad, Standing Counsel for DDA. Mr. Ajjay Aroraa and Mr.Kapil Dutta, Advocates for NDMC.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R % 07.01.2020
CM APPL. 50961/2019 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
CONT.CAS(C) 1045/2019
Mr. Bindra, ld. counsel for petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition stating that the respondents have taken the action in compliance of the orders of the Court.
Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed.
A. K. CHAWLA, J
JANUARY 07, 2020 nn
Mukesh Sethi
Tarun Kapoor & Anr
A. K. Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
