In a contempt application, the petitioner informed the court that arrears of pension were remitted and the petition would not be pressed further. The court allowed the respondents' application for cost waiver and disposed of the petition.
Application for waiver of cost allowed; contempt petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Adv.
versus
VIJAY KUMAR DEV & ORS
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil), GNCTD.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R % 06.01.2020
Ms. Rohmetra, ld. counsel for the petitioner states that the arrears of pension have already been remitted and she has instructions to not to press the petition any further.
Taking note of the submissions made, the application CM 51967/2019, filed on behalf of the respondents seeking waiver of the cost, is allowed and the contempt petition is disposed of accordingly.
A. K. CHAWLA, J
JANUARY 06, 2020
acm
Dharam Singh Rana
Vijay Kumar Dev
A. K. Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
