Petitioner initiated a writ petition. The petition was voluntarily withdrawn before the Court, and accordingly dismissed. All pending ancillary applications were also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~A-10
versus
| NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL | ||
|---|---|---|
| CORPORATION & ORS | ..... Respondents | |
| Through | Mr.Ajjay | Aroraa and Mr.Kapil Dutta, |
| Advs. for | R-1/North DMC. | |
| Mr.Jamal | Akhtar, Adv. for R-2 with | |
| SI Vijay. |
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH O R D E R % 14.02.2020
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All pending applications, if any, are also dismissed.
JAYANT NATH, J.
FEBRUARY 14, 2020/v
SHAHZEB RAZA
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
JAYANT NATH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
