This review petition was heard on 18.05.2020 via Video Conferencing during the COVID-19 lockdown. The court found no cogent grounds to interfere with the prior order and dismissed the review petition, disposing of a pending application as well.
Petitioner to bear costs; pending application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
MANISH L. IDNANI ……. Petitioner
Through: Petitioner-in-person along with his father Mr. Lalit Kumar Idnani
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ……. Respondents Through: Mr. Virender Singh Charak, Advocate for R-1 to R-3
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
ORDER
%
18.05.2020
The present matter has been taken up for hearing by way of Video Conferencing on account of lockdown due to COVID-19.
REVIEW PETITION 99/2020 & CM APPL.10868-69/2020
The present petition has been instituted on behalf of Mr. Manish L. Idnani seeking review of the judgment and order of this court dated 13.02.2020.
The petitioner, who appears in person along with his father Mr. Lalit Kumar Idnani, has been heard at length.
In our considered view, no cogent grounds qua the order dated 13.02.2020 have been made out so as to warrant interference in a review.
W.P.(C) 536/2020 Page 1 of 2
The review petition is accordingly dismissed and disposed of accordingly. The pending application also stands disposed of.
A copy of this order be uploaded on the website of this Court forthwith.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.
TALWANT SINGH, J.
May 18, 2020 dn /nk
W.P.(C) 536/2020 Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether cogent grounds exist to interfere with the order dated 13.02.2020 under review.
MANISH L. IDNANI
UNION OF INDIA & ORS
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
TALWANT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
