Disposed
Vakeel Ahmed v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi (North) & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/2334/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~A-17
Through: None versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI (NORTH) & ORS
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Akshay Verma, Advocate for North MCD, Mr.Balendu Shekhar &h Mr.Ravi Gopal, Advocates for R -2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH O R D E R
% 13.02.2020
On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner had sought some time to file a response to the status report. No response has been filed. The petitioner is appearing in person, states that response has been filed but is lying under objection.
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking appropriate writ to stop hazardous and dangerous activities in the house No. 4828A & 4855, Darziyan, Bara Hindu Rao, Delhi.
The respondent /North DMC has filed two status reports. In the last status report dated 16.09.2019, it was stated that the site was inspected and various steps have been taken which are detailed in the status report.
None has appeared for the petitioner. It is manifest that the respondents are taking steps as per law regarding the illegal activities. In view of this respondent will continue to act as per law.
The petition stands disposed of.
JAYANT NATH, J
FEBRUARY 13, 2020/hk/st
Vakeel Ahmed
Municipal Corporation of Delhi (North)
Jayant Nath
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court