Petitioners sought permission to withdraw their writ petition. The court granted permission and dismissed the writ petition along with pending applications as withdrawn.
Withdrawal of the writ petition and pending applications allowed; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~103
SHANKAR KUMAR JHA AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhishek Baid, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 04.02.2020
Counsel appearing for the petitioners, upon instructions from the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.
In view of the submissions made by the counsel for petitioners, the writ petition along with pending applications is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
FEBRUARY 04, 2020 ns
SHANKAR KUMAR JHA AND ANR.
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
C.HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
