Petitioner withdrew the writ petition and pending applications. Court granted permission to withdraw, disposed of the matter as withdrawn, and vacated any interim relief.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition and pending applications granted; case disposed of as withdrawn; interim relief vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
Through: Ms. Sunny Tayeng, Adv. with petitioner in person
versus
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. H.S. Parihar, Mr. Kuldeep S. Parihar, Ms. Ikshita Parihar, Mr. Tushar Bhushan and Mr. Amartya Bhushan, Advs. Mr. vishal Mittal, Sr. Panel Counsel for R-3
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 04.02.2020
W.P.(C) 11945/2019 and CM Nos. 48926/2019, 4463/2020
Learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions from her client, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. Permission as prayed for is granted.
The writ petition alongwith all the pending applications stand disposed of as withdrawn.
Interim relief, if any, stands vacated.
CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
FEBRUARY 04, 2020/ kr
VIVEK DIXIT
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA & ORS
C. HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
