A single judge order disposing of multiple writ petitions by adherence to a previous judgment in W.P.(C) No. 10930/2019, directing the respondent to process the applications. The petitions are disposed without substantive adjudication on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1 to 7
versus
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. Advocate for petitioner: Mr. Manish Mayank & Mr. Ravi Kant, Advocates Advocate for respondent: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, SC with Ms. Niharika Rai, Mr. Shivam Singh and Mr. Jaideep Khanna, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
O R D E R
Kunwar Mahavidyalaya v. National Council For Teacher Education And Anr. the applications filed by the petitioners in the captioned matters will be processed.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.
FEBRUARY 06, 2020 Hk/VKR
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.(C) No. 10930/2019Referred¶22
VIDYA DEVI MAHAVIDYALAYA AND ANR.
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR.
RAJIV SHAKDHER
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
