The Court disposed of five writ petitions seeking processing of applications. It directed the respondent to follow the terms of a previous judgment regarding similar petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1 to 7
versus
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. Advocate for petitioner: Mr. Manish Mayank & Mr. Ravi Kant, Advocates Advocate for respondent: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, SC with Ms. Niharika Rai, Mr. Shivam Singh and Mr. Jaideep Khanna, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
O R D E R
Kunwar Mahavidyalaya v. National Council For Teacher Education And Anr. the applications filed by the petitioners in the captioned matters will be processed.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.
FEBRUARY 06, 2020 Hk/VKR
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Smt. Amrit Kunwar Mahavidyalaya v. National Council For Teacher Education And Anr.Applied¶1
Vidya Devi Mahavidyalaya and ors
National Council for Teacher Education and anr
Rajiv Shakdher
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
