The Court permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition pending with leave to withdraw before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, dismissing the petition accordingly.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition before the Debt Recovery Tribunal; the petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~
35 + W.P.(C) 13578/2019
L. MADHUSHUDHAN RAO ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Gopal Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr Sunil Malhotra, Mr Aditya Malhotra, Mr Uday Arora and Ms Veera Mehra and Mr Vivek Kumar Karan, Advocates.
versus
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Ajay Bahl, Advocate.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
O R D E R % 20.12.2019 CM 54910/2019 (exemption)
1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 13578/2019 & CM 54909/2019 (stay)
2.Learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present petition to pursue the application already filed by him before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (‘DRT’) in accordance with law, with the request to the DRT to dispose it of in a time-bound manner.
3.The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty prayed for. Pending application is also disposed of.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
TALWANT SINGH, J.
DECEMBER 20, 2019/ rd
L. MADHUSHUDHAN RAO
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS.
S.MURALIDHAR
TALWANT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
