Sameer @ Pahalwan v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court petitioners presented Criminal Reviews were disposed of as infructuous after respondent stated petitioners were acquitted in the FIR case.
What did the court decide?
Petitions disposed of as infructuous.
What the court decided
$~26 & 27
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.REV.P. 1131/2018
- CRL.REV.P. 1138/2018
SAMEER @ PAHALWAN ANISH .....Petitioners Through: Mr. M.K.Perwez, Advocate
Versus
STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Pawan
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R % 13.03.2019
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State has handed over status report to submit that petitioners have been acquitted in the FIR case in question.
In view of aforesaid, these petitions are disposed of as infructuous.
SUNIL GAUR (JUDGE)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SAMEER @ PAHALWAN ANISH
- respondent
STATE
Coram
SUNIL GAUR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court