In a bail application, the Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to record prosecution evidence and conclude within six months. The petitioner sought withdrawal of the application after receiving the direction. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Trial court directed to record prosecution evidence and endeavour to conclude within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
IMRAN KHAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Luqman S.Hasan, Adv. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with SI Vineet Kumar, P.S.SIU/Crime.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 06.02.2019
FEBRUARY 06, 2019/ rk
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
1 issue framed by the court
Whether directions should be issued to the trial court for expeditious disposal of the trial in view of the petitioner being in custody.
Imran Khan
State
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
