This order deals with a condonation of delay application in a contempt petition. The Hon'ble Court condoned a 30-day delay in filing the reply and disposed of the application.
Condoned delay of 30 days in filing reply to contempt petition; reply taken on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~64
versus
BINITA MALIK ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Mamta Nayer and Mr. K. K. Krishna Prabhu, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
O R D E R % 01.05.2019
CM APPLN. NO. 20663/2019 (Delay)
This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of 30 days delay in filing the reply to the contempt petition.
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the
reply to the contempt petition is condoned. Reply is taken on record.
Application stands disposed of.
CONT.CAS(C) 840/2018
Reply has been filed. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Let rejoinder, if any, be filed before the next date of hearing.
List on 30.10.2019.
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
MAY 01, 2019 gr
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amardeep Malik
Binita Malik
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
