In this one-sentence order regarding a writ petition under Article 226, the bench held that the writ petition had been disposed earlier, with this hearing merely for exploring mediation. Due to the petitioner's failure to appear and apparent lack of interest in mediation, the matter was closed and consigned to the record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4.
SACHIN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma, Advocate
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, St. Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advocate with SHO Jai Bhagwan and SI Ashwani Kumar, P.S. Jyoti Nagar for State. Mr. Rahki Dubey, Advocate for R3/Meenakshi with her parents.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA
O R D E R
W.P.(CRL) 3362/2018
Page 1 of 2
HIMA KOHLI, J
YOGESH KHANNA , J
JANUARY 11, 2019 na/sk
W.P.(CRL) 3362/2018
Page 2 of 2
Sachin
State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Hima Kohli
Yogesh Khanna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
