Sabeena v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Avi Singh, ASC for the State with Ms.Purnima Malik, Advocate and SI Sangeeta CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 10.01.2019
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JANUARY 10, 2019 mamta
SABEENA
STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court