Petitioner sought transfer and non-harassment directions. Respondent via affidavit stated petition was already granted. Court dismissed petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
PAPU @RAJU ..... Petitioner
Represented by: Mr. Puneet Garg, Advocate.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for the State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 10.01.2019
By this petition, the petitioner had sought transfer to Jail No. 2, Tihar from Jail No. 15 Mandoli and directions to the respondent not to harass the petitioner.
An affidavit has been filed by the Jail Superintendent indicating that the petitioner has already been transferred and currently the petitioner is in Jail No. 2, General Ward.
In view of the affidavit filed by the Superintendent, Tihar Jail learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition any further.
Petition is dismissed as not pressed.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JANUARY 10, 2019 ‘yo’
PAPU @RAJU
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
