Allowed

Ravinder @ Ravi & Ors. v. State ( NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Delhi HC18 Jan 2019CRL.M.C./259/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court considered a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of an FIR filed for dowry harassment and cruelty. The court observed that the parties had reached a settlement and the respondent's grievances were fully redressed. The application for quashing was allowed.

What did the court decide?

The FIR No.60/2015 dated 21.01.2015 and all proceedings arising therefrom were quashed.

Ravinder @ Ravi & Ors. Vs State ( NCT of Delhi) & Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

$~42

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 259/2019

¶4

RAVINDER @ RAVI & ORS ..... Petitioners

¶5

Through Mr.Krishan Shokeen, Adv.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.M.S. Oberoi, APP for State. Insp.Raj Bala PS South Rohini. Respondent no.2 in person.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R D E R % 18.01.2019

¶10

Crl.M.A. 1103/2019 (Exemption)

¶11

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶12

This application is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶13

Crl.M.C.259/2019

¶14

The petitioners seek quashing of the FIR No.60/2015 dated 21.01.2015 (P.S. South Rohini) instituted for the offences under sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and all other proceedings arising therefrom. Petitioner no.1 was married to respondent no.2 on 08.12.2012 at Delhi. One daughter namely Priyanshi was born out of the wedlock. The relationship between the spouses were not cordial and as such the subject FIR was lodged.

¶15

Issue notice.

¶16

Mr.M.S. Oberoi, learned APP for the State accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.1 and respondent no.2 is present in person and submits that the matter has been settled in the mediation centre, Rohini District Courts, Delhi vide settlement deed dated 01.05.2018 whereby the petitioners agreed to pay an amount of ₹3.5 lakhs to respondent no.2 towards all her claims. ₹2.5 lakh has admittedly been paid to respondent no.2. The balance amount of ₹1 lakh has also been given to respondent no.2 today vide DD No.016537 dated 13.01.2019.

¶17

Respondent no.2, who is present in person, has been identified by Insp.Raj Bala, IO of the case. She has also produced Aadhar Card issued by Government of India vide Aadhar No.466687812541.

¶18

The parties are present in Court and submit that no further grievance now remains to be addressed.

¶19

Considering the fact that the grievance of respondent no.2 has been completely redressed and that no fruitful purpose would be served in further prosecuting the petitioners, this Court hereby to quash the subject FIR No.60/2015 dated 21.01.2015 (P.S. South Rohini) instituted for the offences under sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and all other proceedings arising therefrom.

¶20

The petition is, accordingly, disposed of in terms of the above. Order dasti under the signature of the Court Master.

¶21

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J

¶22

JANUARY 18, 2019 ab

Ravinder @ Ravi & Ors. v. State ( NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravinder @ Ravi & Ors. v. State ( NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prof. Aditya Mukherjee & Ors. Vs Jawaharlal Nehru University & Ors.

Neeraj Kumar Sangwan Vs the Ditrict and Sessions Judge-I and Anr.

Narender Kumar Vs the District and Sessions Judge-I and Anr.

Jitendra Kumard Vs the Delhi State Cooperative Bank Ltd. and Ors.

Sujoy Sonkar Roy Burman Vs Union of India and Anr.

Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd. Vs Union of India & Anr.