Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
BHUSHAN POWER & STEEL LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pranjit Bhattacharya and Ms.Shruti Arora, Advocates.
versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr.Dhruv Pande, Advocate for UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R D E R % 18.01.2019
Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby setting aside the impugned order bearing Office Memorandum F. No. 13016/9/2014-CA-III(Vol. III) dated 30.03.2017 in respect of the Jamkhani Coal Block, inasmuch as the said impugned order treats unequals of specified end-uses of “Iron & Steel”, “Cement”, “Captive Power Plants”, as equal in breach of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, and Section 3(1)(v) and Section 7 of the Coal Mines Act.
Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the Union of India submits that a statement was made before the Division Bench in W.P.(C) 12686/2018 that the Union of India at present is withdrawing the tender for auction of the Jamkhani Coal Mines and accordingly, the aforesaid writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
Learned Standing Counsel submits that the impugned order dated 30.03.2017 has been withdrawn as concerned to the mines in question in the present writ petition.
Thus, the present petition has become infructuous and accordingly dismissed being infructuous.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
JANUARY 18, 2019 rd
BHUSHAN POWER & STEEL LTD.
UNION OF INDIA
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court