The court disposed of a writ petition. It granted the applicant/respondent an extension of four weeks to comply with a previous order regarding an inquiry report, explicitly stating no further extension would be allowed.
Respondent directed to comply with the order dated 18.01.2019 within four weeks; no further extension granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
SUJOY SONKAR ROY BURMAN
..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Arjun Harkauli with Mr. Anshuman Gargesh and Ms. Arunima Bishnoi, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Vivek B. Saharya, Senior Panel Counsel for UOI with Mr. S. S. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rishabh Kumar for Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Adv. for R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R D E R % 20.03.2019
CM APPLN. 12742/2019 in W.P.(C) 483/2019
Vide the present application, the applicant/respondent no.1 seeks extension of time to take a final decision on the inquiry report dated 13.03.2012 for another eight weeks, pursuant to order dated 18.01.2019.
Keeping in view the reasons stated in the present application, I hereby direct the respondent no.1 to comply with the order dated 18.01.2019 within four weeks.
I hereby made it clear that no further extension of time will be granted to the respondent no.1.
The application is, accordingly, disposed of.
A copy of this order be given dasti to the counsel for the parties under the signatures of the Court Master.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
MARCH 20, 2019 ms
SUJOY SONKAR ROY BURMAN
UNION OF INDIA
ANR
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
