The Delhi bench permitted the withdrawal of the petition by the petitioner and dismissed the matter as withdrawn via a concise order.
permission to withdraw the petition was granted. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
versus
M/S VARDHMAN ESTATES & DEVELOPERS (P) LTD & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar and Mr. Munesh Kumar, Advs. for R1, R3 and R4.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
O R D E R % 14.01.2019
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. In the circumstances, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
VINOD GOEL, J.
JANUARY 14, 2019
“sandeep”
ASHOK SINHA & ANR
M/S VARDHMAN ESTATES & DEVELOPERS (P) LTD & ORS
VINOD GOEL
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
