Order where Additional Standing Counsel assured compliance with security provision; petition disposed directing SHO to assess petitioner's letter and provide security for two weeks before reassessment.
State directed to assess petitioner's security letter and provide security for two weeks before reassessment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~54
RADHA SHARMA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, Advocate.
versus
SH. MANJIT SINGH TOMAR & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC and Mr. Rishikesh Kumar, ASC alongwith Mr. Vikas Saini, Mr. Ajay Singh and Mr. Manjeet Tomar, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R
% 18.03.2019
Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, the learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State submits, upon instructions from the SHO of Police Station, GTB Enclave that the State is bound to comply with this Court’s orders and the petitioner’s security, in particular, his letter dated 26.12.2018 to the SHO, GTB Enclave shall be duly assessed and the security in terms of the Court’s order will be provided to the petitioner for two weeks, after which the need for such security shall be re-assessed. He assures the Court that the matter will be looked into by the DCP concerned.
The petition is disposed-off in the above terms.
Liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the Court in case of any difficulty.
A copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the parties under the signature of the Court Master.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J MARCH 18, 2019 RW
Radha Sharma
Sh. Manjit Singh Tomar
Najmi Waziri
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
