Disposed
Ankur Kumar v. Central Reserve Police Force Thr Director General & Anr.
Delhi HCCONT.CAS(C)/853/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
Through: Mr. Akshay Singh and Miss Tasha Singh, Advs.
versus
CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE THR
DIRECTOR GENERAL & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurang Kanth, CGSC with Mr. Rajesh Kumar, ASC.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Mr. Deepak, Advocate for respondent (CRPF)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R
% 18.03.2019
There is no clarity from the respondent apropos appointment of the petitioner in terms of the order of the Division Bench, directing him to be appointed as Head Constable (GD) in CRPF. The case was passed over for the respondent to obtain instructions. Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Standing Counsel for the Govt. of India is present in Court and has been asked to assist the Court.
After receiving instructions, he states that the Court’s orders have been complied with in terms of the application of the petitioner for appointment as Constable (GD) in CRPF. He submits that therefore the reference to his appointment to the post of Head Constable (GD) is a typographical error. The learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions, agrees to this and states that the petitioner is satisfied as being appointed to the post of Constable (GD) since he had applied only for the said post.
In view of the aforesaid, no further orders are required. Accordingly, the petition is disposed off.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
MARCH 18, 2019 ib
ANKUR KUMAR
CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL & ANR
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court