Petition challenged seniority rules as arbitrary. Petitioner sought revival of OAs filed at CAT. Court dismissed petition as withdrawn, granting liberty to apply for revival.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty granted to move application for revival to be considered on merits by the Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
SANTOSH KUMAR AGARWAL AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Saurabh Kripal, Mr.Saket Sikri, Mr.Devesh Tripathi and Mr.Ajay Pal Singh, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Jagjit Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel for Railways, Mr.Vipin Chaudhary and Mr.Preet Singh, Advocates for R-1. Mr.Abhishek Kumar Chaudhary, Government Pleader/Advocate for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R % 12.02.2019
CM APPL. 6262/2019 (exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 1371/2019
By the present petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to declare Rules 328, 329 and 330 governing the seniority of Group A officers in the Ministry of Railway as provided for in the Rules for the Indian Railway Service of Engineers contained in the Indian Railway Establishment Manual
Volume-I Chapter-III to be arbitrary, ultra vires and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
After some hearing in the matter, Mr.Kripal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would revive the three OAs which were filed, being OA Nos.2703/2018, 2704/2018 and 2733/2018 before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in view of the observations of the Supreme Court of India contained in Paras 98 and 99 of L. Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India , reported as (1997) 3 SCC 261.
Learned counsel who enters appearance on behalf of the respondents, opposes the present petition and also submits that relief cannot be granted even before the Tribunal.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty is granted to move an application for revival which would be considered on the merits by the Tribunal.
All legal objections available to the respondents are left open.
G.S.SISTANI, J
JYOTI SINGH, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2019 ssc
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 1371/2019
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to declare Rules 328, 329 and 330 governing seniority of Group A officers in the Ministry of Railway as arbitrary and violative of Article 14.
Whether to revive three OAs filed before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT).
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santosh Kumar Agarwal
Union of India
G.S.Sistani
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
G.S.Sistani and Jyoti Singh
Parties & counsel
