Writ petition seeking demolition of illegal construction closed. Writ petition dismissed as infructuous since respondent No. 3 approached the Appellate Tribunal, MCD where a stay on demolition was granted.
Liberty granted to the petitioner to file an application seeking intervention before the Appellate Tribunal, MCD.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
..... Petitioner
Through:
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.
..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aastha Jain, Adv. with Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Baliyan, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Dhanesh Relan, SC for DDA with Ms. KomalSorout& Ms. Gauri Chaturvedi, Advs. Mr. Dalip Rastogi, Adv. for R-3
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R
construction on the property bearing no. 64-A, Front portion (earlier Central Bank), Main Chowk Badarpur, New Delhi110044, in violation of NDMC Act, 1994 in the interest of justice.
b) Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which is necessary in the facts and circumstances of this case.”
CM Nos. 6424/2019 & 33316/2019
Dismissed as infructuous.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
AUGUST 07, 2019 /ak
SH. LALIT KUMAR BAKSHI
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
DDA
Respondent No.3
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
