The petitioner sought to withdraw his writ petition to avail other legal remedies. The court dismissed the petition and connected application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
SH. SANJEEV KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Jatin Aggarwal, Adv.
versus
M/S SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Shankar Kumar Jha, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R
% 06.08.2019
After some submissions, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition to enable the petitioner seek such remedy as available in law.
The petition and the connected application are dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
AUGUST 06, 2019/ jg
SH. SANJEEV KUMAR
M/S SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND ANR.
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
