Partly allowed

Brij Mohan Basia v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC18 Sept 2019W.P.(C)/8808/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of multiple writ petitions by directing the Delhi Pollution Control Committee to pass reasoned orders within four weeks upon hearing. In a separate order, it stayed coercive steps relating to environmental compensation recovery while allowing time for the respondent to file a reply.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Delhi Pollution Control Committee to pass reasoned orders within four weeks after hearing petitioners. Coercive steps stayed pending reply.

Brij Mohan Basia Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors. — Environment and Pollution | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

Signature Not Verified Signed By:RAM DATT Signing Date:16.10.2024 15:38 M Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.

¶2

¶3

GOVTOFNOTOFDELHI &ORS Through:	THROUGH:ITSCHIEFSECRETARY Respondents Ms.SaumyaTandon,Adv.forR-2. Mr.Biraja Mahapatra, Mr.Kush Sharma&Mr.SumitMishra,Advs. forDPCC.
(10)W.P.(C)9421/2019 NIWASBANSAL Through: versus	Petitioner Mr.ChinmoyPradip Sharma& Mr.ShaileshKumarSinha,Advs.

¶4

GOVTOFNOTOFDELHI ^ORS Through:	THROUGH:ITSCHIEFSECRETARY Respondents Ms.SaumyaTandon,Adv.forR-2.
	Mr.Biraja Mahapatra, Mr.Kush Sharma&Mr.SumitMishra,Advs. forDPCC.
W.P.(C)9442/2019 SANJAYGARG	Petitioner
Through: versus	Mr.ChinmoyPradip Sharma& Mr.ShaileshKumarSinha,Advs.

¶5

(12) W.P.(C) 9442/2019

¶6

GOVT OF NOT OF DELHI THROUGH: ITS CHIEF SECRETARY &ORS Respondents Through: Ms.Saumya Tandon, Adv. for R-2. Mr.Biraja Mahapatra, Mr.Kush Sharma & Mr.Sumit Mishra, Advs. for DPCC.

¶7

¶8

(35) W.P.(C) 8278/2019

¶9

CHANCHAL JAIN Petitioner Through: Mr.Chinmoy Pradip Sharma & Mr.Shailesh Kumar Sinha, Advs.

¶10

versus

¶11

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. Respondents Through: Mr.Biraja Mahapatra, Mr.Kush Sharma & Mr.Sumit Mishra, Advs. forDPCC. Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, ASC/GNCTD with Mr.Deepak Shrivastava, Adv.

¶12

¶13

(36) W.P.(C) 8295/2019

¶14

MUKESH KUMAR SINGHAL Petitioner Through: Mr.Chinmoy Pradip Sharma & Mr.Shailesh Kumar Sinha, Advs.

¶15

versus

¶16

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. Respondents Through: Mr.Biraja Mahapatra, Mr.Kush Sharma & Mr.Sumit Mishra, Advs. forDPCC. (37) W.P.(C) 8296/2019 Petitioner

¶17

¶18

HARSH JAIN

¶19

Through: Mr.Chinmoy Pradip Sharma & Mr.Shailesh Kumar Sinha, Advs.

¶20

versus

¶21

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. Respondents Through: Mr.Biraja Mahapatra, ^ Mr.Kush Sharma & Mr.Sumit Mishi'a, Advs. forDPCC.

¶22

(40) W.P.(C) 8808/2019

¶23

BRIJ MOHAN BASIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Chinmoy Pradip Sharma & Mr.Shailesh Kumar Sinha, Advs.

¶24

versus

¶25

GOVT OF NOT OF DELHI & ORS Respondents Through: Mr.Biraja Mahapatra, Mr.Kush Sharma & Mr.Sumit Mishra, Advs. forDPCC. Ms.Jyoti Taneja, Adv. for GNCTD.

¶26

¶27

(61) W.P.(C) 10110/2019 ..... Petitioner MR. VIJAY GOBL Through: Mr.P.S. Bindra & Mr.Bhuvneshwar, Advs. versus

¶28

DELHI POLLUTION CONTROL COMMITEE AND ANR.

¶29

Respondents Through: Ms.Nidhi Raman, Adv. for R-2. Mr.Biraja Mahapatra, Mr.Kush Sharma & Mr.Sumit Mishra, Advs. forDPCC.

¶30

CORAM:

¶31

¶32

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA

¶33

ORDER

¶34

o/o 18.09.2019 CM APPL. ^»7^S/2019 (Exemption! ^ in W.P T> (C) /r^\ 9411/2019O/ii^nniQ CM APPL- :^8739/2019 (ExemptinnI in W.P.(C) 9413/2019 CM APPL- J8768/2019 rExemptionl in W.P.(C) 9420/2019 CM APPI'- J8776/2019 (Exemption! in W.P.(C) 9421/2019 CM APPL- J8842/2019 (Exemptinnl in W.P.(C) 9442/2019 CM APPI 41798/2019 rExemptionl in W.P.(C) 10110/2019

¶35

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶36

W.P.(C) 9411/2019 & CM APPL. 38736/2019 TStav^ W.P.(C) 9413/2019 & CM APPL. 38738/2019 TStav^ W.P.fO 942n/2019 & CM APPI.. 38769/2019 (Sfay) .W.P.(C) 9421/2019 & CM APPT.. 38777/2019 (Sfay) W.P.(C) 9442/2019 & CM APPL. 3884^/2ni Q W.P.rO 8278/2010

¶37

W.P.(C) 8295/2019 & CM APPL. 34359/2019 fStav) W.P.(0 8296/2niQ W.P.(C) 8808/2019 & CM APPL. 36409/2019 (Stay) W.P.(O101in/2niQ ' ^

¶38

The learned counsels for the parties submit that the present petition(s) treated as a representation by Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) and upon hearing the petitioner(s) thereon, DPCC would pass reasoned order(s) within a period of four weeks. The respondent-DPCC shall also consider if in the meantime the Impugned Order(s) are to be given effect to. The petition(s) are disposed of in view of the above submissions.

¶39

NAVIN CHAWLA, J

¶40

¶41

SEPTEMBER 18, 2019/rv

¶42

¶43

$-43 r * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8295/2019

¶44

MUKESH KUMAR SINGHAL Petitioner Through Mr. Himanshu Bhushan and Ms. Asiya Khan, Advs.

¶45

versus

¶46

¶47

GOVT. OF NCI OF DELHI AND ORS Respondents Through Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Ayushi Bansal, Mr. Sanyam Suri and Ms. Aishwarya Sharma, Advs. for R-1&2 Mr. Kush Sharma, Adv. for DPCC

¶48

CORAM;

¶49

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

¶50

ORDER % 10.12.2021

¶51

CM APPL. 44463/2021 -(direction bv petitioner).

¶52

This is an application filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of the directions issued by respondent no. 3 to the respondent no.2 to recover environmental damages compensation of a sum of Rs.lO lakhs from the petitioner on 05.10.2021.

¶53

¶54

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents communication is not in conformity with the directions issued by this Court on 18.09.2019.

¶55

Issue notice. Mr. Sharma accepts notice on behalf of the respondent no. 3. He prays for, and is granted four weeks' time to obtain instructions and file a reply, if necessary. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed within two weeks, thereafter.

¶56

¶57

Till the next date, no coercive steps in furtherance of the communication dated 05.10.2021 will be taken against the petitioner.

¶58

List on 04.03.2022.

DECEMBER 10,2021

A LLI

Brij Mohan Basia v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brij Mohan Basia v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Court on Its Own Motion Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

M/S Permier Lpg Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and Anr.

M/S Gill International Limited Vs Union of India and Anr.

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs Vikramjeet

Delhi State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. (Dsiidc) & Ors. Vs Rajesh Kumar & Ors.

Dr. Narendra Singh and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Dharam Vir & Ors. Vs Bgs International Public School & Ors.

Sh. Chetan Bagga Vs the Commissioner South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Avm Oil Field Services Vs Gail Gas Limited

Tushiti Chopra Vs Director of Estate

East African (India) Overseas Vs Govt. of National Capital Region of Delhi and Anr.

Mukesh Kumar Singhal Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Harsh Jain Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Chanchal Jain Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.