The Supreme Bench of Navin Chawla J disposed of multiple Writ Petitions concerning the DPCC by recording counsels' submissions that the DPCC would issue reasoned orders within four weeks following the hearing. A parallel note mentions an application by Singhal regarding recovery of environmental damages.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Signed By:RAM DATT Signing Date:16.10.2024 15:38 M Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.
r
| GOVTOFNOTOFDELHI &ORS Through: |
THROUGH:ITSCHIEFSECRETARY Respondents Ms.SaumyaTandon,Adv.forR-2. Mr.Biraja Mahapatra, Mr.Kush Sharma&Mr.SumitMishra,Advs. forDPCC. |
|---|---|
| (10)W.P.(C)9421/2019 NIWASBANSAL Through: versus |
Petitioner Mr.ChinmoyPradip Sharma& Mr.ShaileshKumarSinha,Advs. |
| GOVTOFNOTOFDELHI ^ORS Through: |
THROUGH:ITSCHIEFSECRETARY Respondents Ms.SaumyaTandon,Adv.forR-2. |
|---|---|
| Mr.Biraja Mahapatra, Mr.Kush Sharma&Mr.SumitMishra,Advs. forDPCC. |
|
| W.P.(C)9442/2019 SANJAYGARG |
Petitioner |
| Through: versus |
Mr.ChinmoyPradip Sharma& Mr.ShaileshKumarSinha,Advs. |
(12) W.P.(C) 9442/2019
GOVT OF NOT OF DELHI THROUGH: ITS CHIEF SECRETARY &ORS Respondents Through: Ms.Saumya Tandon, Adv. for R-2. Mr.Biraja Mahapatra, Mr.Kush Sharma & Mr.Sumit Mishra, Advs. for DPCC.
6
(35) W.P.(C) 8278/2019
CHANCHAL JAIN Petitioner Through: Mr.Chinmoy Pradip Sharma & Mr.Shailesh Kumar Sinha, Advs.
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. Respondents Through: Mr.Biraja Mahapatra, Mr.Kush Sharma & Mr.Sumit Mishra, Advs. forDPCC. Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, ASC/GNCTD with Mr.Deepak Shrivastava, Adv.
C
(36) W.P.(C) 8295/2019
MUKESH KUMAR SINGHAL Petitioner Through: Mr.Chinmoy Pradip Sharma & Mr.Shailesh Kumar Sinha, Advs.
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. Respondents Through: Mr.Biraja Mahapatra, Mr.Kush Sharma & Mr.Sumit Mishra, Advs. forDPCC. (37) W.P.(C) 8296/2019 Petitioner
r
HARSH JAIN
Through: Mr.Chinmoy Pradip Sharma & Mr.Shailesh Kumar Sinha, Advs.
versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. Respondents Through: Mr.Biraja Mahapatra, ^ Mr.Kush Sharma & Mr.Sumit Mishi'a, Advs. forDPCC.
(40) W.P.(C) 8808/2019
BRIJ MOHAN BASIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Chinmoy Pradip Sharma & Mr.Shailesh Kumar Sinha, Advs.
versus
GOVT OF NOT OF DELHI & ORS Respondents Through: Mr.Biraja Mahapatra, Mr.Kush Sharma & Mr.Sumit Mishra, Advs. forDPCC. Ms.Jyoti Taneja, Adv. for GNCTD.
O
(61) W.P.(C) 10110/2019 ..... Petitioner MR. VIJAY GOBL Through: Mr.P.S. Bindra & Mr.Bhuvneshwar, Advs. versus
DELHI POLLUTION CONTROL COMMITEE AND ANR.
Respondents Through: Ms.Nidhi Raman, Adv. for R-2. Mr.Biraja Mahapatra, Mr.Kush Sharma & Mr.Sumit Mishra, Advs. forDPCC.
CORAM:
b
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
ORDER
o/o 18.09.2019 CM APPL. ^»7^S/2019 (Exemption! ^ in W.P T> (C) /r^\ 9411/2019O/ii^nniQ CM APPL- :^8739/2019 (ExemptinnI in W.P.(C) 9413/2019 CM APPL- J8768/2019 rExemptionl in W.P.(C) 9420/2019 CM APPI'- J8776/2019 (Exemption! in W.P.(C) 9421/2019 CM APPL- J8842/2019 (Exemptinnl in W.P.(C) 9442/2019 CM APPI 41798/2019 rExemptionl in W.P.(C) 10110/2019
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 9411/2019 & CM APPL. 38736/2019 TStav^ W.P.(C) 9413/2019 & CM APPL. 38738/2019 TStav^ W.P.fO 942n/2019 & CM APPI.. 38769/2019 (Sfay) .W.P.(C) 9421/2019 & CM APPT.. 38777/2019 (Sfay) W.P.(C) 9442/2019 & CM APPL. 3884^/2ni Q W.P.rO 8278/2010
W.P.(C) 8295/2019 & CM APPL. 34359/2019 fStav) W.P.(0 8296/2niQ W.P.(C) 8808/2019 & CM APPL. 36409/2019 (Stay) W.P.(O101in/2niQ ' ^
The learned counsels for the parties submit that the present petition(s) treated as a representation by Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) and upon hearing the petitioner(s) thereon, DPCC would pass reasoned order(s) within a period of four weeks. The respondent-DPCC shall also consider if in the meantime the Impugned Order(s) are to be given effect to. The petition(s) are disposed of in view of the above submissions.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
O
SEPTEMBER 18, 2019/rv
(J
$-43 r * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8295/2019
MUKESH KUMAR SINGHAL Petitioner Through Mr. Himanshu Bhushan and Ms. Asiya Khan, Advs.
versus
P:
GOVT. OF NCI OF DELHI AND ORS Respondents Through Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Ayushi Bansal, Mr. Sanyam Suri and Ms. Aishwarya Sharma, Advs. for R-1&2 Mr. Kush Sharma, Adv. for DPCC
CORAM;
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
ORDER % 10.12.2021
CM APPL. 44463/2021 -(direction bv petitioner).
O
(0
DECEMBER 10,2021
A LLI
ms
o
n
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant interim stay or disposal of the batch of Environmental protection writ petitions.
Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors
Delhi Pollution Control Committee
Mukesh Kumar Singhal
Chanchal Jain
Mr. Vijay Gobl
Niwas Bansal
Navin Chawla
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
