A writ petition challenging the sealing of premises was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner once the property was desealed and vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
JINDAL STAINLESS CORPORATE MANAGEMENT SERVICES PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Ms. Nattasha Garg and Mr. Somesh Tiwari, Advs.
versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Adv. for SDMC.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated July 27, 2018, whereby the respondent Corporation has sealed the premises on the ground that the property was being used for running a play-school. It is the case of the petitioner herein that the property was not being used as play-school, but as a Creche. In any case Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states, the present petition has become infructuous inasmuch as the property has been desealed and the petitioner company / tenant has vacated the same, as such he wishes to withdraw the petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
JULY 11, 2019 /jg
Jindal Stainless Corporate Management Services Pvt. Ltd.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation
V. Kameswar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
