The petitioner withdrew the writ petition as the relief was granted in other proceedings. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Liberty to withdraw granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
TINA SHARMA (MINOR) THORUGH HER FATHER BHAGWATI PRASAD SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Jeetender Gupta and Mr. Anurag Singh, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Bansal and Ms. Seema Dolo, Advs. for R-4/CBSE Mr. T. Singhdev, Ms. Puja Sarkar and Mr. Tarun Verma, Advs. for R-MCI
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
ORDER (ORAL)
% 08.03.2019
1. Mr. Jeetender Gupta appears and submits that he has instructions to withdraw this writ petition as the relief prayed for in this writ petition stands granted under orders passed in certain other proceedings. Liberty is granted as prayed for.
2. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J
MARCH 08, 2019/ kr
TINA SHARMA
UNION OF INDIA
C. HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
