This order dismisses the writ petition as withdrawn by the counsel for the petitioner without any substantive discussion or legal proposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
MS. RIYA BANSAL (MINOR) AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashok Agarwal with
Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advs.
versus
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil), GNCTD with Mr. Zahid Hanief and Ms. Manisha Chaudhan, Advs. Ms. Archana Gaur, OSD Lit Distt. South.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
ORDER (ORAL)
% 07.03.2019
1. Mr. Ashok Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he has instructions to withdraw this writ petition.
2. The present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J
MARCH 07, 2019/ bh
Ms. Riya Bansal and Anr.
Government of NCT of Delhi
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
