The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The application was allowed and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was granted. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
MR. DHIRAJ SINGH NAAGAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Farooqui Alam, Adv.
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan, SC for DDA with Mr. Rajeev Jha, Ms. Komal Sorout and Ms. Mrinalini Shrama, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
ORDER (ORAL)
% 08.03.2019
CM APPL. 51322/2018
1. This application seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
2. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J
MARCH 08, 2019/ bh
DHIRAJ SINGH NAAGAR
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
C. HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
