Om Prakash v. M/S. Bhagwati and Company
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed in default for non-appearance by the petitioner and lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
OM PRAKASH ..... Petitioner
Through Mr.Sarfaraz Khan, Legal Aid.
versus
M/S. BHAGWATI AND COMPANY ..... Respondent Through None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R
Mr.Sarfaraz Khan, Advocate who was appearing for the petitioner states that he had been appointed by the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee, but the petitioner has already taken back the file from him. On the last date also, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. The petition is dismissed in default and for non prosecution.
REKHA PALLI, J JANUARY 09, 2019 sr
Om Prakash
M/s. Bhagwati and Company
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court