This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
M./S. MODLINE FINSTOCK PVT LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through None.
versus
SATPAL ..... Respondent Through Ms.Swati Menon, proxy for Mr.Arjun Kumar, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R
None appears for the petitioner despite passover, the same was the position on the last date. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. The petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
REKHA PALLI, J
JANUARY 09, 2019
sr
M./S. MODLINE FINSTOCK PVT LTD.
SATPAL
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
