Dismissed

Monu v. the Collector/D.C. (South) & Ors.

Delhi HC6 Feb 2019W.P.(C)/7030/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition concerning alleged unauthorized construction on agricultural land, the single judge Bench held that jurisdiction lies with the DDA Special Task Force constituted under Supreme Court orders. The petition was dismissed with liberty to file a complaint before the Task Force.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to approach the Special Task Force constituted by DDA under Office Memorandums dated 25.04.2018 and 23.05.2018.

Monu Vs the Collector/D.C. (South) & Ors. — Land Acquisition | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

$~16

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) No. 7030/2018, CM APPL. No. 26636/2018

¶4

MONU ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Azhar Qareem, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

THE COLLECTOR/D.C. (SOUTH) & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel for R-1. Mr. Rishikesh Kumar, ASC and Mr.Premsagar Pal,Advocate for R-1, 3, 4 & 5.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 06.02.2019

¶10

The petitioner’s grievance is in relation to alleged unauthorized construction on agricultural land bearing Khasra Nos. 1891, 1892, 1893, 1939 to 1953 and Khasra No. 1890 recorded in the name of Gram Sabha, Village Aya Nagar, Tehsil Mehrauli, New Delhi.

¶11

Learned counsel for all five respondents are present.

¶12

Status report dated 20.11.2018 filed on behalf of respondents Nos.1, 3, 4 & 5 confirms that as per the halka patwari , buildings are present in some of the khasra numbers; boundary walls are present in some other khasras numbers; while some khasra numbers are in the possession of the Forest Department.

¶13

Since unauthorized construction is alleged on agricultural land, respondent No. 2/SDMC is not the primary agency concerned with action

¶14

against construction on such land.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that in fact, ‘plotting’ of land is being illegally done ; and no effective action has been taken by the concerned authorities in relation to unauthorized construction and plotting.

¶16

In the context of the petitioner’s grievance, it transpires that in compliance of orders of the Supreme Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 4677/1985 titled M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India & Ors , vide Office Memorandum dated 25.04.2018 the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) has constituted a Special Task Force to comprehensively address violations of the provisions of the Unified Building Bye Laws and Master Plan for Delhi-2021 relating inter alia to construction activity and land-use in Delhi. Vide another Office Memorandum dated 23.05.2018 the DDA has also formulated an action plan for monitoring construction activities in Delhi and for fixing responsibility in case of violations of the Unified Building Bye Laws and the Master Plan.

¶17

Vide order dated 20.09.2018 made in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1807/2018 titled Devender vs. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors. (and connected matters) by the Division Bench of this Court presided-over by Hon’ble the Chief Justice, the Court has held that in view of the setting-up of the Special Task Force under directions of the Supreme Court it is not appropriate for our court to exercise jurisdiction in matters relating to unauthorised construction; and has disposed of such matters granting liberty to the petitioners to raise their grievances before the Special Task Force so constituted, in accordance with the scheme and procedure formulated under the aforesaid two Office Memorandums.

¶18

By order dated 24.09.2018 made in a subsequent matter, being Writ Petition (Civil) No. 9938/2018 titled Suresh Chand Goel vs. East Delhi Municipal Corporation , the Division Bench has followed its earlier order dated 20.09.2018 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1807/2018, similarly disposing of the writ petition, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a complaint before the Special Task Force. I am informed that the Division Bench has subsequently also made similar orders in other matters.

¶19

To be sure, the petitions that were subject matter of the aforesaid proceedings before the Division Bench were petitions filed in public interest and otherwise ; and related to contravention not only of sanctioned building plans but also of various laws , including the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, the Delhi Development Authority Act, 1957, the New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 and the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904 as also encroachment on public land etc.

¶20

The aforesaid Special Task Force is a 15-member outfit with representation of the highest level from all concerned municipal, civic, revenue and law enforcement agencies of Delhi; and is therefore ideally suited for multi-agency, coordinated action against the rampant malaise of breach of various laws, rules and regulations governing building construction and land-use in Delhi.

¶21

I am informed that as of date the Special Task Force even has its own dedicated website and mobile application to facilitate making of complaints, thereby making it even easier for parties to take their grievances before the said agency.

¶22

Accordingly, I am of the view that the correct course of action in this

¶23

matter also would be to dispose of the present writ petition, giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Special Task Force in accordance with the policy and procedure laid down for the purpose in DDA’s Office Memorandums dated 25.04.2018 and 23.05.2018 and avail the said alternate, efficacious remedy.

¶24

This petition is disposed of in the above terms. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶25

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.

¶26

FEBRUARY 06, 2019 Pallavi

Monu v. the Collector/D.C. (South) & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Monu v. the Collector/D.C. (South) & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Mahmuda Ahmad Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Shri Satya Narain Prakash Punj and Anr. Vs Government of NCT of Delhi

Ms. T. Uma (Ifs) Vs Union of India and Ors.

Prof. Shreekant Gupta Vs University of Delhi

Amit Kumar Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.

Aircon Technique Pvt. Ltd. Vs Central Public Works Department and Ors.

Akhil Dabas Vs Sub-Registar,Gnct of Delhi

Manish Kumar Vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.

Ruchika Joshi Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.

Anisha & Anr. Vs Deputy Commissioner ( South) S. D. M. C., Green Park, New Delhi & Ors.

Shri Ram Dev Sharma & Anr. Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

R. K. Gandhi and Anr. Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation

Ms Anu Chakrabarty Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.

Sh. Shiv Shankar Gupta Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation