In this writ petition challenging unauthorized construction, the petitioner failed to appear on the hearing date. After being called for more than once, the petition was dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS
..... Respondent Through Ms.Saroj Bidawat with Ms.Neelam, Advs for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
REKHA PALLI, J
JANUARY 15, 2019/ sr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition should be allowed when the petitioner is in default and no one appears on their behalf.
Asif Iqbal
South Delhi Municipal Corporation
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
