Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition; the court granted leave, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition is granted, and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
KULDEEP KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through Mr.M.K.Sinha with Mr.Ankit, Mr.Sanjeev Kr.Sinha, Advs.
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ramesh Singh, S.C. with Mr.Chiranjiv Jain, Ms.Nikita Goyal, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R % 15.01.2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present petition.
Leave as prayed for is granted.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
REKHA PALLI, J
JANUARY 15, 2019
sr
Kuldeep Kumar
The State (NCT of Delhi)
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
