Cricket player seeking direction to demolish unauthorized construction. Respondent submitted status report showing action initiated under Act. Petitioner withdrew petition with liberty.
None granted; petition dismissed with liberty to move again if need arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
ARUN KUMAR BHATNAGAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Nishant Anand, Adv.
versus
DELHI DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Nirvikar Verma, Adv. for R-1. Ms.Arunima Dwivedi with Ms.Preeti Kumra, Advs. for R-2. Ms.Suman Chaudhary, Adv. for R-5. Mr.Anuroop P.S., Adv. for R-6.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R % 14.01.2019
for.
REKHA PALLI, J
JANUARY 14, 2019 gm
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arun Kumar Bhatnagar
Delhi Development Authority
Work (zz) Pax & Ors.
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
