This Court dismissed a writ petition where the legal representatives of a retired respondent pursued a matter regarding payment of gratuity prior to the CAT.
The writ petition is dismissed. The interim order stands vacated. The application for stay is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~52
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF WORKS, CPWD & ORS
..... Petitioners
Through: Ms.Neha Singh, Mr.V. Balaji and Ms.Sripradha, Advocates.
versus
S.P. SINGH BY LRS ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Mayuri Raghuvanshi and Mr.Vyom Raghuvanshi, Advocates.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
O R D E R
% 14.11.2019
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
TALWANT SINGH, J.
NOVEMBER 14, 2019/ mr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition involving payment of gratuity to a retired employee should be allowed or dismissed.
The Director General of Works CPWD & Ors
S.P. Singh by LRS
S. Muralidhar
Talwant Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
