Single judge order disposing of a writ petition and connected application by relying on and applying the principles laid down in the decision in Mukut Pathak decided on the same day.
Petition and pending application disposed of in terms of the decision in Mukut Pathak case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~52
VISHWA NATH
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr Ravi Kant Chadha, Sr. Advocate with Mr Siddhant Chaudhary, Advocate.
versus
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Nirvikar Verma, Advocate for R-1 and R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 13.11.2019
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
NOVEMBER 13, 2019 MK
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mukut Pathak and Ors. v. Union of India and Anr.Applied¶1
Mukut Pathak and Ors. v. Union of India and Anr.: W.P.(C) 9088/2018 and Other Connected Matters, decided on 04.11.2019
VISHWA NATH
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
