The court corrected a typographical error in a previously disposed writ petition regarding a date and disposed of the retainer application.
Correction of a typographical error in paragraph 3 and discharge of the retainer application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM No. 1574/2020 in
SH. SUJEET SWAMI AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Dr. Dinesh Rattan Bhardwaj and Mr. J.N. Patel, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Central Govt. Standing Counsel with Mr. Kushagra Kumar, Adv. for R-1/Union Of India
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 17.01.2020
CM No. 1574/2020 in W.P.(C) 11501/2019
Having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that there is a typographical error in the order dated 13th November, 2019 whereby W.P.(C) 11501/2019 was finally disposed of.
The error was in paragraph no.3 in the 5th line. Instead of letter dated 28th July, 2019, now it will be read as letter dated 28th July, 2016 in our order dated 13th November, 2019 in W.P.(C) 11501/2019. This correction shall be carried out. Rest of the order dated 13th November, 2019 is maintained as it is.
This application is allowed and disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
JANUARY 17, 2020/ kr
Sh. Sujeet Swami and Anr.
Union of India and Ors.
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
