Shobha Rani v. a K Aggarwal
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi disposed of RFA 973/2018 as not pressed. The respondent voluntarily gave up rights to the money decree. Upon this settlement, the appeal is dismissed.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is disposed of; the respondent gives up rights to the money decree; goods are to be handed over within four weeks.
What the court decided
$~16
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- RFA 973/2018, CM Nos.50465-467/2018
..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.S.Bammi with Mr. Parmod Kumar Pandey & Ms. Shivani Rai, Advs. with appellant in person. (Mobile No.9891911118).
SHOBHA RANI
versus
A K AGGARWAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Sehgal, Adv. (Mobile No.9873479585).
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 03.12.2018
- After arguments, not once but twice pass over was taken by counsel
for the appellant as regards the appeal is not to be pressed because the decree holder/plaintiff/respondent has already taken possession and has very graciously agreed not to press the decree of mesne profits.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shobha Rani
- respondent
A K Aggarwal
Coram
Valmiaki J. Mehta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court