Appeal disposed of as not pressed by the High Court of Delhi, with liberty to rely on Faquira case and exercise right of preemption under the Hindu Succession Act if property is sold.
Appeal disposed of as not pressed; liberty granted to place reliance on precedent and exercise preemption rights.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
SUSHIL KANWAL BHAGAT & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. K. Venkataraman, Advocate with Mr. Dinesh Kumar Chawla, Advocate (M. No.9871277207).
versus
VINOD KANWAL BHAGAT & ORS ..... Respondents Through
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R
% 03.12.2018
two reasons and with respect to which two aspects, liberty is granted to the appellants as stated below.
house by selling the same and that rights of the other brothers/co-sharers can be exercised by constructing their own flats over the suit property inasmuch
as both the appellants also have one flat each on the ground floor and first floor on the suit property.
aforesaid liberty.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
DECEMBER 03, 2018 Ne
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Faquira Vs. Raj Rani and Ors.Referred¶11
Faquira Vs. Raj Rani and Ors. AIR 1984 Del 168 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sushil Kanwal Bhagat & Anr.
Vinod Kanwal Bhagat & Ors.
Valmiki J. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
