Writ petition seeking removal of the arbitrator appointed by the respondent was disposed of as not pressed. The court granted liberty to file a fresh petition for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Petition disposed; liberty granted to file fresh petition for appointment of arbitrator under Section 11.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~O-2
CBRE SOUTH ASIA PVT.LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vaibhav Mishra, Adv. (Mobile No.9810833591).
versus
FIIT JEE , ..... Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 03.12.2018
Arbitrator appointed by the respondent and notice of which is received by the petitioner on 30.11.2018 i.e. after the filing of this petition, and in the
fresh petition, the petitioner can also seek appointment of an Arbitrator in accordance with law under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
DECEMBER 03, 2018/aruna
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition raising a dispute regarding the appointment of arbitrator stands pressed as the petitioner has access to the respondent-appointed arbitrator's notice.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
CBRE South Asia Pvt. Ltd.
FIIT JEE
Valmikaji Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
