The appellant failed to appear and prosecute the appeal. The High Court dismissed the appeal in default and set costs for any restoration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-148
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
KANSI RAM HOTELS PVT LTD. ..... Appellant Through: None.
versus
KAPUR PAPER HOUSE PVT LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Neeraj Kumar Gupta, Advocate (Mobile No. 9999611977).
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA
O R D E R % 03.12.2018
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
AK
DECEMBER 03, 2018
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be allowed given the non-appearance of the appellant?
What consequence does default of appearance have on the appeal?
What conditions apply for restoration of the default order?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kansi Ram Hotels Pvt Ltd.
Kapur Paper House Pvt Ltd.
Valmiki J. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
