The High Court of Delhi dismissed the revision petition as withdrawn by a prior order, noting that no steps had been taken and the counsel offered no explanation, effectively closing the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
SHIV KUMAR @ SIVA KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Arpit Maheshwari, Adv.
versus
RAMESH ANAND ..... Respondent Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 16.05.2018
The revision petition and the application filed therewith were dismissed as withdrawn by order dated 12.03.2018. Notice was directed to be issued limited to the prayer for consideration of enlargement of time.
No steps have been taken. The counsel for the petitioner offers no explanation.
In this view, the proceedings are closed.
R.K.GAUBA, J.
yg
MAY 16, 2018
SHIV KUMAR @ SIVA KUMAR
RAMESH ANAND
R.K. GAUBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
