The petition was dismissed in default due to the non-appearance of the petitioner despite repeated calls and awaiting for appearance.
The petition and applications are dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
Through: None.
versus
PARVEEN KUMAR JAIN & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.K. Jain, Adv. for R-1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 15.05.2018
There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner on the matter being called out repeatedly since morning, even though, it was passed over awaiting appearance in the forenoon. It is 2.17 p.m. The position remains the same.
The petition and the applications are dismissed in default.
R.K.GAUBA, J.
MAY 15, 2018 nk
Sompal Singh
Parveen Kumar Jain & Anr
R.K. Gauba
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
